ITAT · Kolkata Bench2025§68 · §69C · §37

ITAT Kolkata on bogus-purchase additions: supplier's non-filing alone cannot sustain the disallowance

Can purchases be disallowed only because the supplier didn't file returns?

No. Additions for purchases or sub-contract expenses cannot rest solely on the supplier's non-filing or non-response; genuineness must be examined.

Reviewed by Smt. Saseekala Nair, IRS (R), Principal Chief Commissioner of Income Tax (Retd.) · Published 2026-07-07

Facts in brief

  • The AO disallowed purchases and sub-contract expenses because the suppliers/sub-contractors were non-filers of income-tax returns or did not respond to notices.

Issue before the bench

Whether a supplier's compliance default is, by itself, a sustainable basis for disallowance.

Held

The matter was remanded to the lower authorities, giving the assessee another opportunity to prove the genuineness of the transactions.

Practitioner takeaway

Build the genuineness file per supplier (invoice, transport record, payment trail, ITC reflection) and the counterparty's defaults cease to matter.

Practice note · Smt. Saseekala Nair, IRS (R), Principal Chief Commissioner of Income Tax (Retd.)

More on this topic: Sections 68 & 69: Unexplained credits and investments · Need this drafted? Scrutiny Assessment Support for CA Firms

Related rulings

WhatsApp the teamCall now