Faceless assessment & procedure: natural justice in the NFAC era

5 entries · updated 2026-07-07

Faceless assessment moved the procedural ground under practitioners' feet: show-cause windows, portal service, video hearings and SOP timelines are now where assessments are won and lost. The courts have answered with a consistent principle: the machinery may be electronic, but natural justice is not optional.

The rulings here show the enforcement in practice: assessments quashed where the mandatory show-cause notice under CBDT Instruction 20/2015 never issued, a section 144B order set aside for giving under three days to respond against the seven-day minimum, a mechanical 20% pre-deposit demand returned for want of reasons, and a section 263 revision rejected because 'lack of inquiry' was asserted rather than shown from the record. The portal's new 'Response Viewed' status adds a timestamped evidentiary marker practitioners should be capturing in every file.

The working rule for CA firms: log the procedure as it happens. Dates, windows, service modes and portal statuses. The procedural record is frequently the strongest ground in the appeal.

Working one of these files right now? Scrutiny Assessment Support for CA Firms

Rulings in this hub

WhatsApp the teamCall now