ITAT · Mumbai Bench2025§69C
DCIT v. Triton Hotels & Resorts (P) Ltd · ITAT Mumbai on §69C: third-party documents that don't name the assessee
Can seized third-party documents that never name the assessee ground a §69C addition?
No. Documents seized from a third party that do not contain the assessee's name cannot sustain an addition under §69C.
Reviewed by Smt. Saseekala Nair, IRS (R), Principal Chief Commissioner of Income Tax (Retd.) · Published 2026-07-07
Facts in brief
- The addition under §69C rested on documents seized from a third party.
- The seized documents did not contain the name of the assessee.
Issue before the bench
Whether unnamed third-party material is evidence against the assessee.
Held
The Mumbai Bench deleted the addition: identification, corroboration and an opportunity to cross-examine are conditions precedent.
Practitioner takeaway
First question on any search-based §69C addition: does the seized material name the client? If not, demand cross-examination and press for deletion.
More on this topic: Sections 68 & 69: Unexplained credits and investments · Need this drafted? Scrutiny Assessment Support for CA Firms
